For schools, course providers and training companies
Career and course questions, answered before the intake closes.
Prospective students research a career long before they research a course. Vupie builds the pathway content that reaches them at that stage, tied to your intake calendar, with outcome numbers computed from your own data rather than invented.
The calendar runs backwards from your intake
A page that indexes after the deadline has missed by a full cycle
Career pathway guides
"How to become a ..." — where the reader starts
Qualification comparisons
Cited to the awarding body, never asserted
Entry requirements and cost
Refreshed each cycle, not left to go stale
Indexed and ranking
While they are actually researching
Illustrative runway. The real dates come from your admissions cycle, and the plan is scheduled against them rather than against a generic content calendar.
They research the career first
Long before the course.
Long before you.
Long before the intake.
Prospective students start at "how do I become a ...", months ahead of any course name. That is where the pathway content has to be, indexed and ranking, while the intake is still open.
Business analysis
What we read before we plan anything.
The 90 day plan is not a keyword list bought from a tool. It is built from what is already connected to your account, which in education means these four things first.
Your course and programme catalog
What you run, when it runs and what it leads to, so every pathway piece has somewhere to send the reader.
Your admissions cycle
The calendar is built backwards from application deadlines, because a piece that indexes after the intake closes has missed by a year.
Career and qualification queries
The "how do I become" layer, which sits far above course names in volume and far earlier in the decision.
Your student FAQ and admissions inbox
The same fifteen questions, asked forever, none of them answered on a page that ranks.
Where the plan aims
The four clusters that carry
education traffic.
Priority goes to queries you already sit close to, because those are the ones a well-sourced article can actually move.
Career pathways
"how to become a [role]", "is [role] a good career", "[role] qualifications"
Qualification comparison
"[qualification] vs [qualification]", "is [qualification] worth it", "[level] explained"
Cost, duration and format
"how long is [course]", "[course] cost", "part time [subject] course"
Application and entry
"[course] entry requirements", "how to apply for [programme]", "[prerequisite] alternatives"
The output
What actually lands on your site.
Career pathway guide
From where the reader is now to the role they want, with your programme as one honest route among the others.
Qualification comparison
Each framework level and requirement cited to the awarding or accrediting body, never asserted.
Cost and duration explainer
Your real numbers, including the parts applicants get wrong.
Entry requirements and application guide
Practical and current, scheduled to be refreshed each cycle rather than quietly going stale.
Two or three a week
The questions only you can answer.
Research retrieves what is public. It cannot retrieve what only exists inside your business, and guessing it is exactly how AI content gets caught. So before writing, Vupie sends the two or three questions it cannot answer to you by SMS or Slack.
Answering takes a minute, and the answer becomes the part of the article nobody else can publish. In education, they usually look like this.
Intake dates for the spring cohort are not on the site yet. What should the article state?
May we publish completion rates for the diploma, or only enrolment numbers?
Which accreditation body and which reference number should the comparison cite?
Answered
The model may cite only from the retrieved source list plus what you answer here. Anything else is refused.
The gate
What we decline in education.
Worth reading before you sign up rather than after. A refused brief frees the slot and you see the reason, but if most of your topics sit on this list then Vupie is the wrong tool for you and we would rather say so now.
Visa and immigration advice
Legal topics are blocked on the default pipeline. International-student content stops at the practical and points to the official authority.
Guaranteed outcomes
No employment guarantees, no salary promises. Outcome numbers are computed from your own data with the method stated, or they are not published.
Accreditation claims we cannot source
Every accreditation or recognition statement is cited to the body that grants it, or the sentence goes.
Publishing
The usual setup here.
WordPress and Webflow cover most institution sites. Where the main site is governed by a central IT process, the hosted blog runs on your own subdomain and needs one DNS record.
WordPress
Native APIPublishes through the REST API with categories, tags, author and featured image set for you.
How it connectsWebflow
Native APIWrites items into your CMS collection and triggers a site publish.
How it connectsHosted blog
HostedPoint a subdomain at us. We run the whole blog on Cloudflare's edge, on your domain.
How it connectsThirteen destinations in total, including a webhook and a hosted blog for sites with no usable CMS. See every integration.
Questions
What education teams ask.
It is the reason the gate exists. Outcome, accreditation and entry-requirement claims are the ones the pipeline treats as unsourceable-by-default, so they either arrive with a citation you can check in the approval step or they never reach the draft.
Yes. The Growth plan covers one site across four languages, so the same pathway content can run in the markets you recruit from.
Other industries
Connect the site. See the plan
before anything publishes.
The business analysis runs first and produces a rolling 90 day calendar you can see and change. Nothing goes live until you have looked at it.